<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baby Dancing to Beyonce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babypatter.com/2009/09/baby-dancing-to-beyonce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babypatter.com/2009/09/baby-dancing-to-beyonce/</link>
	<description>Memoirs of a Baby&#039;s Parents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:55:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.babypatter.com/2009/09/baby-dancing-to-beyonce/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babypatter.com/?p=569#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Yes, an obvious fake. Obvious if you are familar with childhood development and the physical capabilities of an infant still holding on to the edge of a coffee table for support. There are some legitimate pieces of video - the baby was obviously at the coffee table, and bouncing up and down. During the course of the bouncing, the baby no doubt plopped down to the knees. BUT...

The leg kick? The rhythmatic head swaying? The speed and coordination of some of the moves are not consistent with the hand-eye coordination of an infant who has yet to master the art of walking. AND WAIT..THERE&#039;S MORE..

Think of the camera placement - on a tripod - obviously setup by the operator. It smacks of a staged event. Why didn&#039;t the camera operator attempt to get a side angle shot? Why not film the face of the baby? Because - it would have been too difficult for the photoshopper to pull this off. This photoshopper is good no doubt and has successfully fooled millions to the point where people like me - who see it&#039;s a fake - have been ridiculed as &quot;idiots&quot;. 

Sorry, but this video is fake.

Respectfully,

e</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, an obvious fake. Obvious if you are familar with childhood development and the physical capabilities of an infant still holding on to the edge of a coffee table for support. There are some legitimate pieces of video &#8211; the baby was obviously at the coffee table, and bouncing up and down. During the course of the bouncing, the baby no doubt plopped down to the knees. BUT&#8230;</p>
<p>The leg kick? The rhythmatic head swaying? The speed and coordination of some of the moves are not consistent with the hand-eye coordination of an infant who has yet to master the art of walking. AND WAIT..THERE&#8217;S MORE..</p>
<p>Think of the camera placement &#8211; on a tripod &#8211; obviously setup by the operator. It smacks of a staged event. Why didn&#8217;t the camera operator attempt to get a side angle shot? Why not film the face of the baby? Because &#8211; it would have been too difficult for the photoshopper to pull this off. This photoshopper is good no doubt and has successfully fooled millions to the point where people like me &#8211; who see it&#8217;s a fake &#8211; have been ridiculed as &#8220;idiots&#8221;. </p>
<p>Sorry, but this video is fake.</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
